Uzbek-English Language Interference and its Effect in Teaching EFL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v4i2.2015Keywords:
language interference, native language, target language, bilingual, monolingual, polyglotAbstract
Language as a social phenomenon is closely related to society, a group of people. Language is formed and developed in society. This cannot be denied at all. The fact that language is the main tool in human interaction and communication is an important factor that shows its integral connection with society. Linguistic interference as a social and linguistic phenomenon, is learned by sociolinguistics. The theoretical views on language interference and the occurrence of linguistic interference in different language layers are analysed in this article.
References
Azzouz Adnan. Interference of Syntactic, Lexical and Phonological Aspects from Arabic into English for Syrian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in the HIL at AleppoUniversity //A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Berdialiyev A. Uzbek synchronic sociolinguistics [Ўзбек синхрон социолингвистикаси] – Hujand, 2015.
Berdialiyev A., Zokirov M. Bases of Uzbek and Tajik linguistic relations [Ўзбек ва тожик лисоний алоқаси асослари] –Ferghana, 2018.
Kostina E.A., Hackett-Jones A.V., Bagramova N.V. The impact of interlanguage on students’ bilingual behavior during the process of acquiring a foreign language//www.cyberleninka.ru/
Kushnaryova S. Lexical interference in English-Finnish bilingualism//www.cyberleninka.ru//
Musayeva Z. Analysis of language interference and degrees of its appearance//https: www.cyberleninka.ru//
Tomlinson, T. D., Huber, D. E.; Rieth, C. A.; Davelaar, E. J. (26 August 2009). An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (37): 15588–15593.
Turayeva M. Interlingual interference in language learning//https: www.cyberleninka.ru//
Wahlbrink B. German-English language interference. –Tumbleweed, 2017;
Weinreich U. Languages in contact. Findings and problems. –N.Y., 1953;
Wells J.C. Overcoming phonetic interference//Article published in English Phonetics, Journal of the English Phonetic Society of Japan, 3.9-21 (2000)Zokirov M. Linguistic interference and its occurrence in Uzbek-Tajik bilinguism. [Лингвистик интерференция ва унинг ўзбек-тожик билингвизмида намоён бўлиши]. Thesis of the PhD dissertation. –Тashkent, 2007.
Ахунзянов Э. Двуязычие и лексико-семантическая интерференция. –Казань, 1978;
Верещагин Е. Понятие “интерференция” в лингвистической и психологической литературе //Иностранные языки в высшей школе. –М., 1968;
Виноградов В. Лингвистические аспекты обучения языку//К проблеме иноязычного акцента в фонетике. –М., 1976;
Попова М. Сравнительный анализ понятийного содержания терминов “трансфер”, “трансференция” и “интерференция” в отечественной и зарубежной лингвистике//https: www.cyberleninka.ru//.
Розенцвейг В. Языковые контакты. –Л., 1972; Баранникова Л. Сущность интерференции и специфика ее появления// Проблемы двуязычия и многоязычия. – М., 1972;
