Inadequacy of Economic Growth for Economic Development; an Empirical Study of Indian Economy

Authors

  • Md Abdus Salam Professor, Department of Economics Faculty of Social Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
  • Ruby Khan Assistant Professor, Department of Finance and Banking College of Business Administration, Jazan University, Jazan, KSA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajebm.v3i5.255

Keywords:

Gross Domestic products, human development index, economic freedom, growth and development, government policies

Abstract

GDP or per capita GDP growth is often seen as a measure of well-being and economic success. However, the multifaceted nature of economic development is not taken into account by these indicators, which focuses more on income equality and proper utilization of power. The current measure of economic growth as a GDP has several limitations when it is used to analyze economic development. To study the multidimensional form of development, various indicators such as Human Development Index, Economic Freedom Index, Happiness Index, etc. should be considered more appropriate indications.

This paper covers and examines the relationship between Gross Domestic Product Per Capita PPP $(GDP Per Capita), Human Development Index (HDI) and the Economic Freedom Index (EFI), in context of India through statistical analysis of published data from 1996 to 2018. Studies had already been done on Happiness Index; therefore, it is completely excluded. Time series techniques examine the direction of the relationship and co-integration among the variables. Granger causality test results proved that unidirectional causality is running between HDI and GDP Per capita as well as between HDI and EFI whereas causality is found absent between GDP Per Capita and EFI. This study helps in identifying possible impediments that limit proper policy implementation on one hand and lack of strategic planning and management on the other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brickman, & Campbell. (1971) Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. (N. Y. Press,Ed.) (M. H. Apley, ed., Adaptation Level Theory), 287–302.

Farzanegan, M. R. (2014). Military spending and economic growth: the case of Iran. Defence and Peace Economics , 25(3), 247-269.

Flammang, R. A. (1979, October). Economic Growth and Economic Development: Counterparts or Competitors? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 28(1), 47-61.

G. Ranis, F. S. (2000). Economic growth and human development. QEH, Working Paper # 18.

Ghorpade, J. (2004). Management and the human resource function: a model based on social systems theory. International Journal of Human Resources Development And Management, 4(3), 235.

Kurihara, Y. (2008). Information technology and economic development. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

Kuznets, S. (1934). National Income, 1929-1932. National Bureau of Economic.

Martin, J. (2009). Human resource management. SAGE.

Morris, J. S. (2002 ). Does Financial Development 'Lead' Economic Growth? International Review of Applied Economics, 16(2), 153-168 .

Paldam, M. (1998). Does Economic Growth Lead to Political Stability? . The Political Dimension of Economic Growth, 171-190.

Stern, D. I. (2011). From correlation to Granger causality. Crawford School Research, 13.

Storey, A. (2003). Measuring Development (Local to the Global. Key Issues in Development Studies ed.). (G. a. McCann, Ed.) London: Starling: Pluto Press.

Tondon, S. S. (2010). Balancing Human Development With Economic Growth: A Study of Asean 5. 10 (1), 335-348.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-05

How to Cite

Md Abdus Salam, & Ruby Khan. (2020). Inadequacy of Economic Growth for Economic Development; an Empirical Study of Indian Economy. American Journal of Economics and Business Management, 3(5), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajebm.v3i5.255

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.