State Bank Privatization: The Role of The China Model and Strategic Directions for Expanding Participation in The Securities Market

Authors

  • Bobur Abrorovich Yusupov Researcher of Tashkent State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajebm.v8i4.3451

Keywords:

Public Offering of Shares, IPO, Strategy, Securities Market, Stock, Transformation, “China Model” of State Bank Privatization

Abstract

The transformation and privatization of state-owned banks play a pivotal role in fostering financial stability, improving competitiveness, and expanding capital market participation, particularly in developing economies seeking to modernize their banking systems. Uzbekistan, like many transitioning economies, is undergoing reforms to align its banking sector with global market standards. The state’s dominant position in the financial sector is being re-evaluated through policy measures guided by international experience, especially the strategic “China Model” of bank privatization. Despite growing global interest, there is limited empirical research on the strategic sequencing and effectiveness of privatization models specifically tailored to developing markets, especially concerning the role of state banks in the securities market. This study aims to examine strategic directions for expanding state banks' participation in the securities market during privatization and assess the applicability of the China Model to Uzbekistan’s context. The analysis highlights key areas including institutional reform, public IPOs, restructuring before divestment, and prudential supervision. Empirical data show that staged IPOs, improved governance, and foreign strategic investment enhance transparency and competitiveness. The Chinese model, with its blend of state oversight and market participation, has proven effective in boosting bank performance and reducing non-performing loans. The study introduces a comparative framework for evaluating state bank privatization strategies with emphasis on the role of securities markets, drawing actionable lessons from China’s hybrid model for broader applicability. Findings inform policymakers on balancing efficiency and control during bank privatization. Strategic sequencing, regulatory integrity, and inclusive capital market development are crucial for ensuring successful outcomes in the privatization of state-owned banks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “Additional Measures to Increase the Popularity of Banking Services,” 2018.

F. Sanchez, D. Silva Jr., and S. Srisuma, “Bank Privatization and Market Structure in Brazil: A Dynamic Structural Analysis,” Rand Journal of Economics, Oct. 2018.

Central Bank of Uzbekistan, “Banking Statistics.” [Online]. Available: https://cbu.uz/oz/statistics/bankstats/1966627/

Central Bank of Uzbekistan, “Central Bank of Uzbekistan News.” [Online]. Available: https://cbu.uz/oz/press_center/news/269986/

V. K. Rai and D. K. Pandey, “Does Privatization Affect Public Sector Bank Stock Prices? An Approach to the Study of Events in Indian Banking Sector Shares,” Asian Journal of Accounting Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–83, 2022, doi: 10.1108/AJAR-06-2021-0078.

S. Journal, “Does Privatization of the Postal Savings Bank in Japan Have Economic Value?” [Online]. Available: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=7472

K.-I. Oohama and Y. Asai, “Does Privatization of the Postal Savings Bank in Japan Have Economic Value?,” Business, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 254–260, 2011, doi: 10.4236/ib.2011.33032.

D. Marston and A. Narain, “Observations from the Review of the International Monetary Fund,” in The Future of Public Financial Institutions, G. C. et al., Eds. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2004, pp. 51–72. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt1287b1t.6

Wharton Initiative on Financial Policy and Regulation, “Privatization Policy Analysis Paper.” [Online]. Available: https://wifpr.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/12-03.pdf

A. M. Andrews, “State-Owned Banks, Stability, Privatization, and Growth: Practical Policy Decisions in a World Without Empirical Proof,” IMF Working Paper, WP/05/10, International Monetary Fund, 2005.

SlideServe, “Successes and Failures in Bank Privatization: Lessons from Six-Country Case Studies.” [Online]. Available: https://www.slideserve.com/nuri/successes-and-failures-in-bank-privatization-lessons-from-six-country-case-studies

Brookings Institution, “The Future of State-Owned Financial Institutions.” [Online]. Available: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-future-of-state-owned-financial-institutions/

ResearchGate, “The IPO of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and the ‘Chinese Model’ of Privatizing Large Financial Institutions.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228241660

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “The Strategy for Reforming the Banking System of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2020–2025,” 2020.

J. A. Hanson, “Transformation of State Banks,” in The Future of Public Financial Institutions, G. C. et al., Eds. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2004, pp. 13–50. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt1287b1t.5

Downloads

Published

2025-04-14

How to Cite

Yusupov, B. A. . (2025). State Bank Privatization: The Role of The China Model and Strategic Directions for Expanding Participation in The Securities Market. American Journal of Economics and Business Management, 8(4), 1422–1430. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajebm.v8i4.3451

Issue

Section

Articles