MARITAL RAPE STRIPPING THE SANCTITY OF MARITAL RELATION

AN INTERNATIONAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Anjali Tripathi a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:43:"Student (4th Year, Amity Law School, Delhi)";}
  • Mr Nikunj Bhatnagar Student (4th Year, Amity Law School, Delhi)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v1i5.187

Keywords:

Marital Rape, Women Rights, Sexual Rights, Marriage, Marital Rights, women in marriage, United Nations, domestic violence, battered women

Abstract

Marital Rape is an important socio-legal concept which has been attracting the attention of the international community since eternity. The political debates and social discourses surrounding it have fuelled various discussions on feminism and the rights of women in a marriage. Such discussions are even extended to the sexual rights of a married woman and the denial of the same that has been happening due to the patriarchal mindset of the society. The concept of considering a woman as a property has been hailed and criticized time and again by jurists and courts.

 

Various municipal legislations are dedicated towards this crime and some international instruments also mention about it. However, the level of expected change in the society throughout the world, especially in countries where marital exception still exists, hasn’t been seen. Thus, there is a demand for an international convention for the same. The same is analysed in this article.

References

Ruchira Tabassum Naved et al., Men’s Attitudes and Practices Regarding Gender and Violence Against Women in Bangladesh, Partners4Prevention (2011).

Rachel Jewkes, Sexual Violence Research Initiative, Rape Perpetration: A Review, Sexual Violence Research Initiative, 6 (2012).

Model Penal Code § 213.6 (Proposed Official Draft 1962).

Oregon v. Rideout, 5 FAM. L. REP. (BNA) 2164 (1978).

People v. Liberta, 90 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div.: 1982).

M. Hale, The History of the Pleas of Crown, 629 (1 ed. 1778).

John Federick, Pleading and Evidence in Criminal Cases (1822).

R. v. Clarence, 22 Q.B.D. 57 (1889).

R. v. Clarke, 2 All E.R. 448 (1949).

Regina v. R., 1 AC 599 (1992).

End Violence Against Women, Major New YouGov Survey for EVAW: Many People Still Unclear What Rape Is, End Violence Against Women (26 July, 2020, 15:03 PM), https://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/major-new-survey-many-still-unclear-what-rape-is/.

Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Human Rights Brief: Violence Against Women in Israel, RefWorld (26 July, 2020, 16:38 PM), https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6a81218.html.

Yehudis Fletcher, Marital Rape Is Expressly Forbidden In Jewish Law. However…, Jewish News (27 July 2020, 12:59 PM), https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/shameful-denial-and-defence-of-marital-rape-must-end/.

Criminal Appeal 91/80, 35 (3) PD ( 1980 ) 281.

Vasanthi Venkatesh, ‘Pluralistic Legal Systems and Marital Rape: Cross-National Considerations’, 89-136, (2017) .

Downloads

Published

2020-11-18

How to Cite

Tripathi, A., & Bhatnagar, N. (2020). MARITAL RAPE STRIPPING THE SANCTITY OF MARITAL RELATION: AN INTERNATIONAL ANALYSIS. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 1(5), 32–62. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v1i5.187

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.