History and Definition of Copula: A Diachronic Survey
Keywords:
-Abstract
This study provides a diachronic survey of the copula, tracing its conceptual evolution from its philosophical origins in Aristotle to its modern linguistic analyses, with a particular focus on its manifestations in Bangla and other Indo-European (IE) languages. The copula, a near-ubiquitous linguistic element, serves as a syntactic linker, verbalizer, and marker of propositional truth claims, yet its form and function vary significantly across languages. Beginning with Aristotle’s ontological treatment of the Greek copula ‘esti’ as a logical and metaphysical bridge, the study examines medieval scholastic contributions, notably Abelard’s formalization of the term ‘copula’ as a syntactic connector. Renaissance and Port-Royal grammarians further shifted the focus to its grammatical role, while 19th-century comparative philology and 20th-century linguistic theories - encompassing structuralism, generative grammar, formal semantics, and typology - revealed its syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic complexity. In Bangla, the coexistence of overt and zero-copula constructions highlights language-specific variability, challenging universalist assumptions about the copula’s necessity. Pustet’s (2005) typological critique underscores the copula’s context-dependent nature, as seen in languages like Tagalog and Russian, where predication occurs without an overt copula. This paper synthesizes these perspectives to propose a multifaceted definition of the copula as a language-specific element that facilitates predication, verbalizes non-verbal predicates, and encodes truth claims, modulated by pragmatic and discourse factors. By integrating philosophical, logical, and linguistic insights, this study illuminates the copula’s interdisciplinary significance and its role in bridging syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. The analysis of Bangla’s copula system offers a valuable case study for exploring cross-linguistic diversity, contributing to ongoing debates about the copula’s universality and functional scope in linguistic theory.
References
Ackrill, J. L. (1997). Aristotle: Categories and De interpretatione (J. L. Ackrill, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford University Press.
Arnauld, A., & Lancelot, B. (1976). General and rational grammar: The Port-Royal grammar (J. Rieux & B. E. Rollin, Trans.). Mouton Publishers.
Bach, E. (1979). Introduction to transformational grammars. Holt, Rinehart and Winston & R.
Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects. Oxford University Press.
Bopp, F. (1886). Comparative grammar of the Sanskrit, Zend, Greek, Latin, Lithuanian, Gothic, German, and Slavonic languages (E. B. Eastwick, Trans.). Madden & Malcolm.
Chomsky, N. (1958). Syntactic structures. Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and grammar. Foris.
Chvany, C. V. (1975). On the syntax of be-sentences in Russian. Slavica Publishers.
Crystal, D. (1997). A first dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. André Deutsch.
Dasgupta, P. (1980). Questions and relative and complement clauses in a Bangla grammar [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
den Dikken, M. (1997). Copulas [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Fernández Leborans, M. J. (1999). La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2357–2460). Espasa Calpe.
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought (J. van Heijenoort, Trans.). In J. van Heijenoort (Ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 (pp. 1–82). Harvard University Press.
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Universals of language. MIT Press.
Heggie, L. (1988). The syntax of copular structures [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Hengeveld, K. (1992). Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Mouton de Gruyter.
Heycock, C., & Kroch, A. (1999). Pseudocleft connectivity via copula predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(3), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554110
Higginbotham, J. (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16(4), 547–593.
Higgins, F. R. (1973). The pseudo-cleft construction in English [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. Allen & Unwin.
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. Routledge.
Leibniz, G. W. (1966). Logical papers (G. H. R. Parkinson, Ed. & Trans.). Clarendon Press.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding (P. H. Nidditch, Ed.). Clarendon Press.
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge University Press.
Mikkelsen, L. (2005). Copular clauses: Specification, predication, and equation. John Benjamins.
Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. John W. Parker.
Moro, A. (1997). The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge University Press.
Partee, B. H. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Foris.
Pustet, R. (2005). Copulas: Universals in the categorization of the lexicon. Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. MIT Press.
Radford, A. (1997). Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge University Press.
Rothstein, S. (2001). Predicates and their subjects. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Russell, B. (1918). The philosophy of logical atomism. George Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. George Allen & Unwin.
Schachter, P., & Otanes, F. T. (1972). Tagalog reference grammar. University of California Press.
Stassen, L. (1997). Intransitive predication. Clarendon Press.
Thomas Aquinas. (1920). Summa theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Burns & Oates.
Thompson, H. (2010). Bengali. John Benjamins.
Webster’s new world dictionary of the American language. (1984). Simon & Schuster.
Williams, E. (1980). Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(1), 203–238.
