Competency of Police Investigators on the Application of Digital Forensics in Cybercrime Investigation in Jigawa State Police Command, Nigeria
Keywords:
Application of digital forensics, Competency of police investigators, Cybercrime investigation, Jigawa State Police Command, NigeriaAbstract
This study investigates the competency of police investigators in the application of digital forensics in cybercrime investigation within the Jigawa State Police Command, Nigeria. The study is anchored in the Routine Activity Theory (RAT). RAT posits that crime occurs when a motivated offender meets a suitable target in the absence of a capable guardian. The theory is therefore the theory is relevant in examining whether police investigators possess the necessary digital forensic skills to serve as effective guardians in the cyber domain. A quantitative survey design was employed in the study, with 351 questionnaires distributed while 302 were valid and analyzed. The findings revealed that crimes, such as cyber defamation and cyberstalking were more frequently investigated than technically complex crimes like cyber terrorism and hacking. Findings also revealed significant skill and training deficits among investigators, because over 77% had never attended any form of forensic training and 80% lacked training in digital forensics. Only 25.5% rated their digital forensic competency as high, while over half believed the police were not capable of effectively investigating all forms of cybercrime. The study concludes that the limited digital forensic competency of police officers hampers effective cybercrime investigation. It therefore recommends targeted capacity-building programmes, integration of digital forensics into police training curricula, and increased recruitment of ICT-competent personnel.
References
1. Abdullahi, S.A. (2016). Edited in Danmusa, A.H. (2016). Fundamental of criminal investigation Nigeria: Abu Press Ltd.
2. Ackermann, R. & Schützel, A. (2011). Selected Problems of the Development of Criminalistics In Germany. Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, University of Maribor, Kotnikova 8, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
3. Agunos, J. C. L & Diaz, R. A. (2019). Investigation and Detective Competencies of the Philippine National Police in the Province of Bataan: Basis for Professional Development Plan. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 7 (5), 147-152.
4. Alisigwe, O. J, & Oluwafemi, O. M. (2019). The State of Forensic Science in Crime Investigation and Administration of Justice in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 10 (7), 1720-1725.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological review. 82 (2), 191-215.
6. Craiger, P. (2008). Training and Education in Digital Evidence. Humana Press Inc.
7. Gehl, R. & Plecas, D. (2016). Introduction to Criminal Investigation: Processes, Practices and Thinking. New Westminser, BC: Justice Institute of British Columbia.
8. Hussein, M. D, Sarki, Z. M, & Lalu, A. U. (2017). Forensic Science, Electronic Evidence and Cybercrime Prosecution in Nigeria. In Ndubueze, P. N. (Eds). Cyber Criminology and Technology Assisted Crime Control: A Reader (pp, 367-394). Zaria, Nigeria: Ahmadu Bello University Press.
9. Ibrahim, B. & Mukhtar, J. I (2017). Emerging Cyber Terrorism Threats. In Ndubueze, P.N (Eds), Cyber Criminology and Technology Assisted Crime Control: A Reader (pp, 415-428) Zaria, Nigeria: Ahmadu Bello University Press.
10. Jang, Y. (2009). Best Practices in Cybercrime Investigation in the Republic of Korea. Retrieved from UNAFEI, Resources Material Series No. 79.
11. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30 (3), 607-610.
12. Magalla, A. (2013). Security, Prevention and Detection of Cyber Crimes. Tumaini University Iringa University College.
13. Maras M. (2014). “Computer Forensics: Cybercriminals, Laws, and Evidence”, Jones & Bartlett Learning Print.
14. Ndubeze, C. (2019). Application of ICT and Other Forensic Tools in Investigation and Prosecutions. The NJI National Workshop for Investigators and Prosecutors.
15. Ndubueze, P. N. (2019). Cyber Criminology and Quest for Social Order in Nigerian Cyberspace. The Nigerian Journal for Sociology and Anthropology, 14 (1), 33-47.
16. Ndubueze, P.N (2017). Cyber Criminology: Contexts, Concerns and Directions. In Ndubueze, P. N. (Eds). Cyber Criminology and Technology Assisted Crime Control: A Reader (pp, 1-28). Zaria, Nigeria: Ahmadu Bello University Press.
17. Roussev, V. (2016). Digital forensic science: issues, methods, and challenges. Synthesis Lectures on Information Security, Privacy, & Trust.
18. Roussev, V. (2019). CyBOK Forensics Knowledge Area. The National Cyber security Centre.
19. Sarki, U.S & Yau, M. (2019) The Role of NSCDC in Crime prevention in Nigeria: Conceptual and empirical Analysis. International journal in Trend of Research and Scientific Development, 3 (2), 1015-1019
20. Sarki, Z. M. & Saat, G. A. M. (2020). Adaptability Traits and Perception of Forensic Science among Investigating Police Officers (IPOs) in Nigeria. Salus Journal, 8 (1), 75-92.
21. Sarki, Z. M. & Saat, G. A. M. (2020). Differences in Forensic Science Training among the investigating police officers in Nigeria. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 4 (6), 109-124.
22. Sarki, Z.M, and Saat, G. A. M. (2018). Preparedness and Challenges of Police in Using Forensic Science: A Review of Some Related Literature. ESTEEM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 14-24.
23. Sindhu, K. K. & Meshram, B. B. (2012). Digital Forensics and Cyber Crime Datamining. Journal of Information Security, 03 (03), 196-201.
24. Umar, Y. (2018). Nature and Pattern of Cybercrime. Unpublished BSc. Project, Submitted to the Department of Sociology, Federal University Dutse.
25. Yar, M. (2013). “Cybercrime and Society”. SAGE Publications Ltd, Hardcover, 2, 1-20.
26. Yassir A. and Nayak S. (2012). Cybercrime: A threat to Network Security. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 12 (2), 84-88.
