Leadership and Technology Driving Structural Change in Banking Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v6i7.3761Keywords:
Banking transformation, digital innovation, transformational leadership, financial institutions, structual equation modeling, regulatory challengesAbstract
This study examines the transformational processes within the banking system, focusing on the intersection of digital innovation, leadership behavior, and institutional readiness for change. In the context of rapid technological advancement and evolving regulatory environments, the research identifies a significant gap in empirical studies that integrate transformational leadership with systemic digital transformation, particularly in transitional economies. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study combines quantitative data from structured surveys with qualitative insights from managerial interviews across banking institutions. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was applied to analyze relationships between leadership practices, technological adoption, and organizational performance. The findings reveal that transformational leadership—characterized by inspirational motivation and intellectual stimulation—positively influences digital innovation and process modernization. However, critical barriers such as outdated IT infrastructure, inadequate data analytics capacity, and regulatory constraints continue to hinder comprehensive transformation. These challenges are especially pronounced in emerging markets, where institutional inertia and resource limitations persist. The study underscores the need for holistic transformation strategies that align leadership, digital capability, and policy frameworks. The results offer practical implications for financial institutions and regulators aiming to foster resilient and innovation-driven banking systems. Future research is recommended to explore longitudinal impacts of digital reforms and the ethical dimensions of fintech integration, contributing to the development of more inclusive and sustainable financial ecosystems.
References
[1] G. M. Giannakidis, "Financial institutions digital transformation: the stages of the journey and business metrics to follow," J. Financ. Serv. Mark., vol. 29, pp. 590–606, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41264-023-00223-x.
[2] A. Tsindeliani, T. D. Sadovskaya, Z. G. Popkova, and M. Davydova, "Digital Transformation of the Banking System in the Context of Sustainable Development," J. Money Laundering Control, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 563–578, 2021, doi: 10.1108/JMLC-02-2021-0011.
[3] K. K. Ibrahimov, M. R. Tashtamirov, and A. R. Bazaeva, "Impact of Public-Political Factors on Transformational Processes in National Banking Systems," Eur. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. ISCKMC2020, pp. 2110–2113, 2021, doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.05.279.
[4] E. E. Ovsyannikova and E. S. Chulova, "Transformation of the Banking System," Eur. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. GCPMED2020, pp. 1083–1086, 2021, doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.04.02.129.
[5] Y. Shyyab, The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Product and Process Innovation: A Study of the Jordanian Banking Sector, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Huddersfield, UK, 2022.
[6] L. Magomaeva and S. Galazova, "Banking innovations as the basis for digital transformation of the banking sector," Eur. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. ICEST2021, pp. 1809–1813, 2021, doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.02.202.
[7] S. K. Suyunov, K. Ergashev, and M. Ergashev, "Transformation Processes Implemented in the Banking System and Possibilities of Implementing It in Our Country," Int. J. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 636–639, 2025.
[8] O. Werth, C. Schwarzbach, D. R. Cardona, and M. H. Breitner, "Influencing factors for the digital transformation in the financial services sector," Z. Gesamte Versicherungswiss., vol. 109, pp. 155–179, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12297-020-00486-6.
[9] F. Ciampi, M. Faraoni, J. Ballerini, and F. Meli, "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," J. Bus. Res., vol. 134, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.045.
[10] G. Long, Y. Tan, J. Jiang, and C. Zhang, "Federated Learning for Open Banking," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 2030–2041, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3088573.
[11] S. Nilsson Tengstrand, P. Tomaszewski, M. Borg, and R. Jabangwe, "Challenges of Adopting SAFe in the Banking Industry—A Study Two Years after its Introduction," in Proc. 2021 IEEE Int. Conf. Softw. Maint. Evol., pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICSME52107.2021.00010.
[12] V. Stefanelli, F. Manta, and P. Toma, "Digital financial services and open banking innovation: Are banks becoming invisible?," J. Bus. Res., vol. 142, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.045.
[13] F. Ciampi, M. Faraoni, J. Ballerini, and F. Meli, "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," J. Bus. Res., vol. 134, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.045.
[14] D. Schallmo, C. A. Williams, and J. Tidd, "Digital Transformation of Business Models—Best Practices, Enablers and Roadmap," Int. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1–17, 2017, doi: 10.1142/S136391961740014X.
[15] D. Schallmo, J. Kolb, S. Leible, and L. Maslowski, "Sustainability-enabled assessment of digital technologies," Int. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.114
