Employing Knowledge Attributes Achieve Entrepreneurial Learning: An Exploratory Study of the Opinions of a Sample of the Teaching Staff at the Technical Institute / Karbala

Authors

  • Hashim Jabbar Majeed Technical institute of babylon- AI Furat Al Awsat Technical University (ATU), Iraq
  • Khariya abed fadel Technical Institute of Al Diwaniyah, AI Furat Al Awsat Technical University (ATU), Iraq
  • Wasan kamil afloog Technical Institute of Al Diwaniyah, AI Furat Al Awsat Technical University (ATU), Iraq

Keywords:

Knowledge Attributes, Entrepreneurial Learning

Abstract

The current study employing the correlation and influence relationship between the Knowledge Attributes (knowledge embeddedness, knowledge distance) and the Entrepreneurial Learning with its dimensions (explorative leering , exploitative leering)., One main hypothesis was formulated and two sub-hypotheses emerged, 94 questionnaires were distributed to the teaching staff at the Technical Institute of Karbala, of which 86 were returned by 91%, while the questionnaires were not valid for analysis 14 by 9%, which is of vital and prominent importance in the field of education and knowledge and its diverse practices in creating an educated, civilized and educated generation. The data were collected through a questionnaire prepared For this purpose, , SPSS vr programs were used. 24 To extract the results of correlation and influence and test hypotheses, as the validity of the hypotheses was found in the light of the results of the statistical analysis, and a number of recommendations were reached, perhaps the most prominent of which is the existence of a vital and prominent effect of knowledge Attributes in the Entrepreneurial Learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R. and Ridderstrtde, J. (2002), “Knowledge as a contingency variable: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure”, Organization Science, Vol. 13 No. 3,pp. 274-28.

Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Nummela, N. and Saarenketo, S. (2008), “The role of trust and contracts in the internationalization of technology-intensive born globals”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 25 Nos 1/2, pp. 123-135.

Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A. and Pavia, K. (2001), “Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 597-621.

Cummings, J.L. and Teng, B.S. (2003), “Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 20 Nos 1/2, pp. 39-68

Holsapple, C. W. and Singh, M. (2005). Performance Implications of the Knowledge Chain. International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 1, No. 4, October-December 2005.

Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine. The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.

Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. London: Heinemann.

Duchesneau, D.A. & Gartner, W.B. (1990). A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(5), 297–312. Dyer, W.G. (1994).

Towards a theory of entrepreneurial careers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 7–9.

Dyke, L.S., Fischer, E.M., & Reuber, A.R. (1992). An inter-industry examination of the impact of owner experience on firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 30(4), 72–87. Fiet, J.O., Piskounov, A., & Gustafsson, V. (2000). How to decide how to search for entrepreneurial opportunities. Paper presented at the 20th annual Babson College-Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boston, MA.

Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 333–341.

Eriksson, P. E., Larsson, J., & Pesämaa, O. (2017). Managing complex projects in the infrastructure sector—A structural equation model for flexibility-focused project management. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1512–1523. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.015

Eriksson, P. E., & Leiringer, R. (2015). Explorative and exploitative learning in project-based organizations: Improving knowledge governance through a project management office? Engineering Project Organization Journal, 5(4), 160–179. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/21573727.2015.1104665

Eriksson, P. E., Leiringer, R., & Szentes, H. (2017). The role of co-creation in enhancing explorative and exploitative learning in project-based settings. Project Management Journal, 48(4), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800403

Holsapple, C. W., Jones, K. and Singh, M. (2007). Linking Knowledge to Competitiveness: Knowledge Chain Evidence and Extensions. In M. E. Jennex (Ed.), Knowledge Management in Modern Organizations. Hershey, Idea Group Publishing.

He, Z.-L. L., & Wong, P.-K. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.

Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92.

Komorouski, J., Pawlak, Z., Polkowski, L. &Skowron, A. (1999). Rough sets: A tutorial.In: Pal, S.K., Skowron, A. (eds.), RoughFuzzy Hybridization: A New Trend inDecision-Making, 3-98,.

Skowron, A. & Rauszer, C. (1992). Thediscernibility matrices and functions ininformation systems, In: Slowinski, A (ed.),Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook ofApplications and Advances of the RoughSets Theory, pp. 331-362.

Nonaka, I. (1994), “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science,Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 14-37.

Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002), “Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension”,Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 185-203.

knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 33 No. 9, pp. 1090-1102.

Zhou, K.Z., Yim, B. and Tse, D.K. (2005), “The effects of strategic orientations on technology and market-based breakthrough innovations”, Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 69 No. 2, pp. 42-60.

Zhou, Q., Fang, G., Yang, W., Wu, Y. and Ren, L. (2017), “The performance effect of micro-innovation in SMEs: evidence from China”, Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 1-16.

Yu, C.-M. J., Liao, T.-J., & Lin, Z.-D. (2006). Formal governance mechanisms, relational governance mechanisms, and transaction-specific investments in supplier-manufacturer relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 128–139.

Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an inter-organizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 373– 392. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995).

Zhou, J., & Xue, Q. (2013). Organizational learning, ambidexterity, and firm performance. The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 537–546)

Downloads

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Majeed, H. J. ., fadel, K. abed ., & afloog, W. kamil . (2022). Employing Knowledge Attributes Achieve Entrepreneurial Learning: An Exploratory Study of the Opinions of a Sample of the Teaching Staff at the Technical Institute / Karbala. American Journal of Economics and Business Management, 5(5), 160–168. Retrieved from https://globalresearchnetwork.us/index.php/ajebm/article/view/1183