A Camel Model Analysis of Private Sector Banks in India
Keywords:
CAMELS Model, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank and YES BankAbstract
CAMEL model analysis is an important tool to analyse the banks’ and financial institutions’ performance and to suggest the necessary measures for its improvement where it is required. In India, RBI adopted this approach in 1996 followed on the recommendations of Padmanabhan Committee (1995). In the present study an attempt was made to evaluate the performance & financial soundness of selected private sector banks like ICICI, HDFC AND YES bank using CAMEL approach from 2017 to 2021 as well one way ANOVA method. It is observed that on an average ICICI Bank was at the top most position. It is also observed that Yes Bank was at the bottom most position in selected CAMEL ratios.
Downloads
References
Baral, K.J. (2005), Health Check-up of Commercial Banks in the Framework of CAMEL: A Case Study of Joint Venture Banks in Nepal, The Journal of Nepalese Business Studies, 2(1), pp.41-55.
Bodla, B.S. and Verma, R. (2006), Evaluating Performance of Banks through CAMEL Model: A Case Study of SBI and ICICI, The ICFAI Journal of Bank Management, 5(3), pp.49-63.
Dash, M. and Das, A. (2009), A CAMELS Analysis of the Indian Banking Industry, Social Science Research Network paper no. 1666900. http://www.ssrn.com/
Economic Survey (2014-2015), Ministry of Finance Publication Division, Government of India.
Gupta, R. (2008), A CAMEL Model Analysis of Private Sector Banks in India, Journal of Gyan Management, 2(1), pp.3-8.
Kaur, H.V. (2010), Analysis of Banks in India- A CAMEL Approach, Global Business Review, 11, pp.257-280.
Kwan, S. and Eisenbeis, R. (1997), Bank Risk, Capitalization and Operating Efficiency, Journal of Financial Services Research, 12(2/3), pp.117-131.
Prasad, K.V.N and Chari, A.A. (2011), Financial Performance of Public and Private Sector Banks: An Application of Post Hoc Tukey HSD Test, Indian Journal of Management Sciences, 2(5), pp.79-92.
Prasuna, D.G. (2004), Performance Snapshot 2003-04, Chartered Financial Analyst, 10(11), pp. 6-13.
Reddy, K.S. (2012), Relative Performance of Commercial Banks in India using CAMEL Approach, Research Journal of Economic and Business Studies, 1(4), pp.1 -10.
Sangmi, M. and Nazir, T. (2010), Analysing financial performance of commercial banks in India: Application of CAMEL model, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 4(1), pp.40-55.
Siva, S. and Natarajan, P. (2011), CAMEL Rating Scanning (CRS) of SBI Groups, Journal of Banking Financial Services and Insurance Research, 1(7), pp.1-17.
Srinivas, K. and Saroja, L. (2013), Comparative Financial Performance of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank, Scholars World-International Refereed Multidisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(2), pp.107-112.
Tripathi, D. and Meghani, K. (2014), Financial Performance of Axis Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank in the Post Reform Era: Analysis on CAMEL Model, International Journal of Business Quantitative Economics and Applied Management Research, 1(2), pp.108-141.
Baru, (2014 February 11) Indian banks: Five years after global financial crises, Business standard Retrieved from http://www.business-standard.com
Chen, J. (2003). Capital adequacy of Chinese banks: evaluation and enhancement. Journal of Banking Regulation, 4(4), 320.
Dang U. (2011). The CAMEL rating system in banking supervision: A case study of Arcada. University of Applied Sciences.
Erol, C., F. Baklaci, H., Aydoðan, B., & Tunç, G. (2014). Performance comparison of Islamic (participation) banks and commercial banks in Turkish banking sector. EuroMed Journal of Business, 9(2), 114-128.
Kumar, M. A., Harsha, G. S., Anand, S., & Dhruva, N. R. (2012). Analyzing soundness in Indian banking: A CAMEL approach. Research Journal of Management Science, ISSN, 2319, 1171.
Majumder, M. T. H., & Rahman, M. M. (2016). A CAMEL Model Analysis of Selected Banks in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 6(2), 233-266.
Mathuva, D. M. (2009). Capital adequacy,cost income ratio and the performance of commercial banks: The Kenyan Scenario. The International journal of applied economics and Finance, 3(2), 35-47.
