Comparative Analysis of Terms of Address in English and Uzbek Languages

Authors

  • Rakhimova Dilnoza Tohirjon kizi Fergana State University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v3i10.1546

Keywords:

terms of address, title, linguistic features, T/V forms of addressing words.

Abstract

We aimed to study comparatively linguistic features of terms of address in English and Uzbek language. This article analyzes different approaches to this issues by several linguistic scholars. This article can be a manual for English learners in order to get social, cultural and semantic features of using address terms or titles in English and Uzbek languages appropriately.

References

Baker, Paul. 2010. Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language 4(1): 125–149.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele. 1989. The CCSARP coding manual. In: Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 273–294.

Bonsignori, Veronika, Bruti, Silvia, and Masi, Silvia. 2012. Exploring greetings and leave-takings in original and dubbed language. In: Henri Bloemen, Cees Koster, and Ton Naaijkens (eds.), Exploring Greetings and Leave-takings in Original and Dubbed Language. Leiden: Brill, 357–379.

Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin u.a.: Mouton de Gruyter.

Clyne, Michael, Norrby, Catrin, and Warren, Jane. 2009. Language and Human Relations: Styles of Address in Contemporary Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hickey, Raymond. 2003. The German address system: Binary and scalar at once. In: Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 401–426.

Kakharov, K., & Usmonova, M. (2022). Nonverbal Means of Uzbek and English Speech Etiquette. Journal of Ethics and Diversity in International Communication, 2(5), 61-65.

Kakharov, K. (2022). NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NONVERBAL MEANS. Gospodarka i Innowacje., 53-58.

Kaharova, M. (2021). MICRO FIELD OF LEXEMES WHICH DENOTE UZBEK PEOPLES’HOLIDAYS AND WORK CEREMONIES. THEORETICAL & APPLIED SCIENCE Учредители: Теоретическая и прикладная наука, (9), 646-648.

Kakharova, M., & Yusupova, D. (2022). NEW APPROACHES TO LESSON PLAN.

Mukarramovna, Q. M., & Rahmonaliyevna, A. G. (2022). NEMIS TILI DARSLARIDA ENERJAYZER OYINLARDAN FOYDALANISH HAQIDA AYRIM MULOHAZALAR. BARQARORLIK VA YETAKCHI TADQIQOTLAR ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI, 91-93.

Кахаров, К. Ш. Узбек ва немис нуткий этикетларининг киёсий тадкики. Филология фанлари буйича фалсафа доктори (PhD) илмий даражасини олиш учун тайёрланган диссертацияси, Андижон-2020.

Искандарова Ш. Ўзбек нутқ одатининг мулоқот шакллари. Фил.фанлари номз.дисс.автореферати. Самарқанд, 1993.

Cаидхонов М. Алоқа-аралашув ва имо-ишоралар. – Т. “Фан”. 2008.

Мўминов С. Ўзбек мулоқот хулқининг жинс жиҳатдан хосланиши // Ўзбек тили ва адабиёти, 64-66 бетлар.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-13

How to Cite

Rakhimova Dilnoza Tohirjon kizi. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Terms of Address in English and Uzbek Languages. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 3(10), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v3i10.1546