Economic Impact and Performance Trends in Uzbekistan's Chemical Industry (2016-2030)

Authors

  • Mirkhodjayev Abrorkhodja Higher School of Business and Entrepreneurship under the Cabinet of Ministers (08.00.16 – Independent Researcher in the specialty “Digital Economy and International Digital Integration”)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajebm.v8i1.3191

Keywords:

Uzbekistan Chemical Industry, Business Benefits, Performance, Digital Transformation, Modernization Projects

Abstract

Over the last five years, Uzbekistan has been experiencing substantial changes in its chemical industry regarding its development strategies, digitalization, and policy improvements. Nevertheless, studies in this area are still lacking, the qualitative effects of these strategies on economic performance. Given its research objectives, the present study uses survey data methodology along with document analysis to look at performance trends and the economic effect of the chemical industry from 2016 to 2030. Interviews with IT practitioners, governmental and other officials, as well as representatives of large enterprises informed about key modernization obstacles, the role of digital transformation, and institutional support. According to the findings, production volumes have increased significantly from 2,333 billion UZS in 2016 to 15,716 billion UZS in 2023 and predicted 44,369 billion UZS in 2030. E-adoption increased from 5% in 2016 to a projection of 95% by 2030, promoting productivity and firm competitiveness. Some of the common issues include restricted infrastructure, reduced skilled human resources, and issues with sustainable practices. These findings are consistent with the general tendencies in the process of industrial development and the use of new technologies in the international context. This research suggests to attain 2030 goals, policies shall remain sensitive to the development of infrastructures, digitization of human resources, incentives for international investors, and sustainability. The chemical sector will benefit from this multidimensional approach along with the overall economic development strategy for Uzbekistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aslund, A. (2019). Russia's Crony Capitalism: The Path from Market Economy to Kleptocracy. Yale University Press.

Belov, M., & Yakovlev, S. (2021). Industrial Growth and Innovation Clusters in Russia's Chemical Sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(2), 245-263.

Chen, Y., & Lee, M. (2020). Technological Advances in Chemical Production. Chemical Engineering Journal, 35(4), 563-578.

ICCA (2022). Global Chemical Industry Report. International Council of Chemical Associations.

Janssen, P., & Müller, R. (2021). The Role of Emerging Economies in the Chemical Industry. Global Economic Review, 12(3), 123-135.

Karimov, A., & Bekmuratova, N. (2020). Industrial Policy Reforms in Uzbekistan. Central Asian Economic Review, 10(1), 45-67.

Khasanova, D. (2022). Sustainability in Uzbekistan's Chemical Industry. Environmental Policy Journal, 29(2), 112-128.

Nguyen, T., et al. (2020). Digital Transformation in Manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(1), 78-90.

Rakhimov, S. (2021). Economic Reforms in Uzbekistan's Industry. Uzbekistan Economic Review, 15(2), 34-56.

Shirinova, M., et al. (2022). Strategic Development of Uzbekistan's Chemical Industry. Central Asian Business Journal, 19(3),

Rakhimov, S. (2021). Economic Reforms in Uzbekistan's Industry. Uzbekistan Economic Review, 15(2), 34-56.

Uzbekistan Ministry of Economy. (2017). Strategy for the Development of Uzbekistan’s Chemical Industry (2016-2030).

Shirinova, M., et al. (2022). Strategic Development of Uzbekistan's Chemical Industry. Central Asian Business Journal, 19(3), 78-95.

Nguyen, T., et al. (2020). Digital Transformation in Manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(1), 78-90.

Rahmonov, A. (2021). Challenges in Digital Adoption in Uzbekistan. Digital Economy Journal, 10(4), 112-130.

Khasanova, D. (2022). Sustainability in Uzbekistan's Chemical Industry. Environmental Policy Journal, 29(2), 112-128.

Giannikopoulos, I. (2024). Thermal Electrification of Chemical Processes Using Renewable Energy: Economic and Decarbonization Impacts. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 63(27), 12064–12082. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00737

Rangel-Buitrago, N. (2024). Navigating between socio-economic viability and environmental impacts: The sachets and sticks paradox. Science of the Total Environment, 920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171022

Vimal, S. (2024). Economic impact, pathogen identification and management of blossom and peduncle blight in tuberose: A review. Plant Science Today, 11(4), 798–803. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4039

Zhang, J. (2024). A 150 years record of polycyclic aromatic compounds in the Sihailongwan Maar Lake, Northeast China: impacts of socio-economic developments and pollution control. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, 26(10), 1748–1759. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4em00309h

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Abrorkhodja, M. (2024). Economic Impact and Performance Trends in Uzbekistan’s Chemical Industry (2016-2030). American Journal of Economics and Business Management, 8(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajebm.v8i1.3191

Issue

Section

Articles