Language is a Reflection of Customs and Values of a Nation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v3i9.1488Keywords:
language, society, culture, nation, tradition, science, developed, modernAbstract
The phenomenon called “language” has been the main study problem of representatives of world science and interest in it is being continued even at the present. What is recognized by all scientists is that language, society, culture, national traditions and values are interconnected and cannot be separated from each other. The next very important issue is that all languages of the world serve their nation equally well. So, there are no rich, poor, developed or underdeveloped languages. No one has the right to call them "rich" or "poor", even if the number of words in languages is different, because each language serves its nation equally and completely. If a native speaker finds it difficult to express his thoughts, he either creates a new word based on his own language or borrows words from neighboring languages. The next one, that is, word acquisition, is an active product of globalization.
References
Iriskulov M.T. “Zamonaviy globallashuv jarayonida millat tili va madaniyatining o’rni”. 2020 yil – ilm, ma’rifat va raqamli iqtisodiyotni rivojlantirish yili/2020 год – развития науки, просвещения и цифровой экономики. (“The role of national language and culture in the process of modern globalization”. 2020 is the year of development of science, enlightenment and digital economy)
Komil Kalanov, Umida Sabirova “Ijtimoiy Antropologiya”. Toshkent “Go To Print” 2020. 74- bet. (“Social Anthropology”. Tashkent “Go To Print” 2020. P 74)
M. Saidova. U. Qoʻziyev “Lingvokulturologiya” Manual. Namangan - 2017. P 93
Nursulton Shayxislamov. The article: “Hozirgi zamon tilshunosligida til va madaniyatning talqini”. “Scientific Progress” Scientific Journal ISSN: 2181-1601 / Volume: 1, ISSUE: 1
Ubaydullayev Sh.N. “Kasb-hunar kolleji o‘quvchilariga madaniyatlararo muloqotni o‘rgatish”. Dissertatsiya. 2009. (“Teaching intercultural communication to vocational college students” Dissertation.2009)
Гумбольдт В. Язык и философия культуры. - М., 1985.
Bronislaw Malinowski, The group and the individual in functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology. 1939
Cefr, “Diskuss kompetensiyasi va fuksional kompetentsiya”-2002. Pp 101-130.
C. Franke. Plying frames can be dangerous. Some reflections on methodology in cognitive anthropology. In R. Caisson (Ed) Language, culture and cognition. New York: Macmillan
C. Joseph, M. Winzar and V. Pollard. “Schooling in Australia: The interplay of education politics, and culture”. In schooling around the world: Debates, Challenges and practices,ed.” 2006
C. Ovando, V. Collier. Bilingual and ESL classrooms. New-York: McGraw – Hill. 1985
E. Sapir. Culture, language and personality. Bekeley, C.A.: University of California Press. 1949
Gee. Discover Book. 2008. P 100
Kramsch. Language and Culture. 2006. P 101
