ARCHIVAL INSTITUTIONS IN MODERN UZBEKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v1i1.18Keywords:
Uzbekistan, archival institution, management system, training specialists, international relations, reform, development perspectiveAbstract
Abstract: Archival documents functioning as “storing humanity memory”, the activity of archive institutions which are significant articulations of intellectual potentiality play significant role to solve this actual scientific problem. In present days, the archives of Uzbekistan, which have approximately 150 year-history play significant role in the development of contemporary science and social life. Because, as an institution incarnating documentary information relating to the activity of state and society, archives are considered to be a specific “laboratory” of History.Having survived the Soviet policy of centralization and the residual principle of financing the activities of the archives, in modern Uzbekistan the regulatory and legal framework of archives has been radically reformed, international relations of archives on informatization and improving services are strengthening, and the qualified archival specialists are trained. Uzbekistan remained the system of direct subordination of the Main Archive Department concerning with archival affairs to the highest governmental executive body: to the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The main objective of the Agreement is the exchange of information, research and development, description, study of archival collections containing documents relating to the issue of “Holocaust” and its history. Gradually from the tackling of internal logistical problems, the State Archive of Uzbekistan began to turn to the issues of improving the quality of acquisition, accounting, preservation and creation of appropriate conditions for the use of archival documents.
Keywords: Uzbekistan, archival institution, management system, training specialists, international relations, reform, development perspective
References
2. Knight, G. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12-32. Crossref
3. Avlonitis, G. J., & Salavou, H. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 566-575. Crossref
4. Bitzenis, A., & Nito, E. (2005). Obstacles to entrepreneurship in a transition business environment: the case of Albania. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 564-578. Crossref
5. Doing Business 2011: Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. – http://krefeld.ihk.de/media/upload/ihk/imap/20110106/doing_business_2011.
6. Economic Commission for Europe. Committee on Economic Cooperation and Integration “Creating an enabling environment for innovation and knowledge-based competitiveness.” Summary of policy options for creating supportive environment for innovative development. Geneva, 3-5 December 2008. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://www.unece.org/ceci/documents/2008/session3/ECE_CECI_2008_3_r.pdf6.
7. Entrepreneurial environment in Uzbekistan in opinion of representatives of small and private entrepreneurship. The report of International Financial Corporation (IFC), State Secretariat for Economic Affairs of Switzerland (SЕСО) The World Bank Group (WBG).Tashkent, 2006.
8. Filippova I. State, region, and business organizations in the innovation economy. – Bulletin of the SSU. – 2011, № 10 (91). – p.104-109.
9. Filippova I. State, region, and business organizations in the innovation economy. – Bulletin of the SSU. – 2011, № 10 (91). – P.104-109.
10. Loginov V.A., Murashova E.V., Formation of an effective business environment as a way to enhance the competitiveness of innovative production systems. PNU Bulletin, 2010. № 1 (16). – p. 119-128.
11. Orchakov O.A .The system of environmental factors. Organization theory. M., 2009.
12. Radas, S., & Božić, L. (2009). The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy. Technovation, 29(6), 438-450. Crossref
13. Rasanayagam, J. (2011). Informal economy, informal state: the case of Uzbekistan. International journal of sociology and social policy, 31(11/12), 681-696. Crossref
14. Shaikhutdinova G.F. Components of business: personal, economic, organizational. – Bulletin of the BIST / № 3 (11), September 2011. – p. 81-85.
15. Shikunova L.N., Drobysheva O.V., Innovative development of the corporate business environment. Recent studies of social problems, № 1 (05), 2011. – p.136-140.
16. Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1-15. Crossref
17. Tsypin I.S. Entrepreneurship as a subject of a market economy, its government regulation in a market. Russian business, 2007. № – p. 42-46.
18. The Law of Republic of Uzbekistan. Law of registration fee from legal entities engaged in entrepreneurial activity and the order. December 28, 1993. No. 996-XII.
19. The decision of Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Uzbekistan. About cardinal perfection of system of registration procedures for organization of entrepreneurial activity. August 20, 2003. No. 357.
20. The Decision of the President of Republic of Uzbekistan. On introduction of notifying order of the state registration and statement on the account of entrepreneurial units. May 24, 2006. No. 357.
21. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2004). Business environment and firm entry: evidence from international data (No. w10380). National Bureau of Economic Research. Crossref
22. Vorozhbit O.J., Zubov N.V., Koren A., The structure of the business environment: Determinants. PNU Bulletin, 2010, № 4 (19). – p.121-128.( 478 (1)_copy)
23. Yiu, D. W., Lau, C., & Bruton, G. D. (2007). International venturing by emerging economy firms: the effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 519-540 Crossref
