Engaging Students to Flipped Classrooms by Active Learning Strategies

Authors

  • L. Nazarova Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v4i1.1917

Keywords:

flipped classroom, active learning activities, millennial

Abstract

A flipped classroom is an opportunity to use readily accessible technology to free class time from traditional lectures which allows for an expanded rage of learning activities such as greater teacher-to-student mentoring, peer-to-peer collaboration and cross-disciplinary engagement during class time. This paper investigates the "flipped" or "inverted" classroom model in order to address obstacles of engaging millennial in lecture-based classrooms and presents an argument for application of the "flipped classroom" model by educators in the disciplines of family and consumer sciences. A feeling of importance to adapt to nowadays students learning preferences is enhanced as educators increasingly struggle to grasp the attention of modern learners. Unlike previous generations, now students reared on rapidly evolving technologies demonstrate decreased tolerance for lectures. Using active learning strategies is critical in order to reach today`s students.

References

A.Roehl, Sh.Linga Reddy, G.Jett Shannon (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity to engage Millenial Students through Active Learning Strategies.

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J, (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12-25.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Bligh, D. A. (2000). What's the use of lectures? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bonwell, C. C, & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.

Chickering, A. W, & Gamson, Z. F (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin.

McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Prensky, M. R. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Roehl, A. (2013). Bridging the field trip gap: Integrating webbased video as teaching and learning partner in interior design education. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(1), 42-46.

Slocum, A., & Beard, C. (2005). Development of a CAI module and comparison of its effectiveness with traditional classroom instruction. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 23(4), 298-306.

Strayer, J. E (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system.

Strayer, J. F (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171-193.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.

Wilson, M., & Gerber, L. E. (2008). How generational theory can improve teaching: Strategies for working with the 'millennials.' Currents in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 29-44.

Zayapragassarazan, Z., & Kumar, S. (2012). Active learning methods. NTTC Bulletin, 19(1), 3-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-25

How to Cite

Nazarova, L. . (2023). Engaging Students to Flipped Classrooms by Active Learning Strategies. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 4(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v4i1.1917