A Cognitive-Semantic Analysis of Prepositions on and in: A Case Study in Open Educational College / Center of Najaf

Authors

  • Mustafa K. Abduljaleel General Directorate of Education/ Najaf / Iraq
  • Thulfiqar A. Suliman General Directorate of Education/ Najaf / Iraq
  • Basim J. Kadhim General Directorate of Education/ Najaf / Iraq
  • Saad L. Shamkhy General Directorate of Education/ Najaf / Iraq
  • Jabal F. Hassan General Directorate of Education/ Najaf / Iraq
  • Youssra Q. Ali General Directorate of Education/ Najaf / Iraq
  • Taqwa R. Juma'a General Directorate of Education/ Najaf / Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v4i5.2221

Keywords:

Cognitive Linguistics, Cognitive Semantics, Prepositions

Abstract

It is believed that English is considered a big problem for non-native learners, especially for Iraqi EFL learners. Prepositions are the core of one of these interference marks. Thus, grammatical prepositions do not use the same rule for each language. Iraqi EFL students based on their native language for translation before producing English language patterns. English language in Iraq is considered a second language. Cognitive linguistics shows a better account while learning English prepositions than traditional methods while acquiring a second language since meaning is crucial in recognizing the correct preposition. This research paper attempts to draw attention to the importance of prepositions' various functions and develop the ability of the students to use prepositions and on correctly in different contexts. This paper is devoted to testing the validity of the following hypotheses: It is hypothesized that using prepositions correctly is difficult for foreign learners. It is assumed that most learners are familiar with the uses of the preposition in rather than the preposition on. This study is restricted to identifying the functions of prepositions in and on producing their uses separately.

Moreover, the practical part is restricted to examining the ability to use the correct preposition of a group of (20)  students in different stages in Open Collage of Education/ Center of Najaf. Finally, the test results showed that cognitive linguistics has an important role and significant effectiveness. Cognitive linguistics shows a better account while learning English prepositions than traditional methods while acquiring a second language since meaning is crucial in recognizing the correct preposition. It is a significant way to clarify the meaning.

References

Bailey, D.R. (1997) A Computational Model of Embodiment in the Acquisition of Action Verbs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation: University of California at Berkeley .

Celce-Murica, Marianne; Larsen-Freeman, Diane; and Williams, Howard Alan (1999): The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course. 2nd Edition. Boston: MA: Heinle and Heinle.

Crystal, David. (2008) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Cuenca, M. J. and Hilferty, J. (1999) Introducción a la lingüística cognitiva Barcelona: Ariel .

Evans V. & Tyler A. (2005). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Pedagogical Grammar: The English Prepositions of Verticality. Revista Brasileira de linguistica aplicada, 5(2), 11-42.

Evans, V. & Tyler, A. (2006). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Pedagogical Grammar: The English Preposition of Verticality’ in Gitte Kristiansen (ed). Cognitive Linguistics: Current Application and Future Belin/ New York Mouton Gruyter.

Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive Linguistics. WIREs Cogn Sci. doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1163 Ibrahim, B. Haruna, H. H. Bashir, I. & Yunus, K. (2018). The Usage of Spatial Prepositions in the Headlines of Major Nigerian Newspapers. Internations journal of English Linguistics; 8, (7); doi:10.5539/ijel. v8n7p13.

Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lindstromberg, S. (1998). English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.

Lindstromberg, S., & ebrary Academic Complete. (2010). English prepositions explained (rev. ed.). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Nasser, S. M. (2020). A Cognitive-Semantic Analysis of Preposition on: An Experimental Study at University of Baghdad . Arab World English Journal, 11 (3) 493 -501. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.32

Pustejovsky, J. (1989). Language and spatial cognition. Computational Linguistics, 15 (3), 187-190.

Shepherd, John; Richard Rossner; and Taylor, James (1990): Ways to English Grammar: A Modern English Practice Book. London: Macmillan Publisher.

Trask, R. L. (2007) Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts. 2nd . Edition. New York: Routledge.

Tyler, A. &Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tyler, A., Mueller, C. M., & Ho, V. (2011). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Learning the English Prepositions To, For, and At: an experimental investigation. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (8), 122- 140.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-26

How to Cite

Mustafa K. Abduljaleel, Thulfiqar A. Suliman, Basim J. Kadhim, Saad L. Shamkhy, Jabal F. Hassan, Youssra Q. Ali, & Taqwa R. Juma’a. (2023). A Cognitive-Semantic Analysis of Prepositions on and in: A Case Study in Open Educational College / Center of Najaf. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 4(5), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v4i5.2221