Foreign Democratic Assistance and Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v3i7.1316Keywords:
Foreign Aids, Democratic Assistance, ConsolidationAbstract
Foreign democratic assistance is a strand of foreign policy adopted by governments and international organisations seeking to support the spread of democracy as a political system. While Nigeria has been one of the major recipients of this assistance, running into hundreds of billions of dollars and other non-monetary measures in 1999-2019, her democratic elections have failed to deliver increased stability and development. This raises the question as to what extent Nigeria’s democratic experience since 1999 is a reflection of the objectives of foreign democratic assistance to her. Highlighting the issue will allow policymakers and academics to accept that the flawed general elections since 1999 have continued to threaten Nigeria's fragile democratic experiment as a result of election irregularities rather than a lack of foreign democratic assistance. In achieving this, the study relied on content analysis, using personal observations and secondary sources. The realistic theory of change propounded by Anderson and a modification of Carol’s (1972) change model theory were used as the framework of analysis. The data was analysed qualitatively. With tables and simple percentages, it shows that despite the quantum of democratic assistance to Nigeria between 1999 and 2019, her political development has remained gloomy. Although the level of assistance may not be high enough to improve the entire electoral process in Nigeria, it has made an impact in those specific areas that the assistance is directed at. It also shows that Nigeria’s effort towards democratic consolidation is still not a reflection of the objective (s) of FDA because her electoral integrity is still threatened by many factors, such as the attitude of political leaders, electoral corruption, and so on. However, the study recommends that in order for FDA to be successful, the political elite's value orientation must change; the war on corruption must be pursued with vigour; government at all levels must be serious and pay more attention to the problem of poverty; and there must be greater harmonisation and alignment of national policies.
References
Adetula, V., Kew, D., & Kwaja, C. (2010). Assessing democracy assistance: Nigeria. The United Nations Democratic fund
Allana, A. (2014). Navigating complexity: adaptive management in the Northern Karamoja growth, health & governance program. Engineers without borders Canada and Mercy Corps.
Anyalebechi, S. M. (2022). The 2019 General Elections and the future of democracy in Nigeria. International Journal on Integrated Education, 5(5), 311-335
Anyalebechi, S. M. (2022). The roles of some selected institutions in democratic consolidation in Nigeria, 1999-2021. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 10(8), 21-28
Bariledum, K., Godpower, N. B., &Tambari, N. S. (2016). “Foreign democratic assistance to Nigeria (1999-201): The nexus between strategy and elections results”. Global journal of political science and Administration, 14(1), 29-37.
Breuning, M & Ishiyama, J. T (2003) Donor characteristics and the dispersion of foreign assistance. International Politics www.palgrave-journals.com 40(2):249-268,
Dessalegn Rahmato, Meheret Ayenew (2004), Democratic assistance to post-conflict Ethiopia: impact and limitations, FSS monograph series, no. 3, Addis Ababa: Forum for Social Studies
Dessalegn, R. & Meheret A. (2004) Democracy assistance to post-conflict ethiopia: building local institutions?, CRU Working Paper 27 (The Hague: Clingendael Institute), pp.9–15.
Domingo, P & Nwankwo, C (2010) Review of international assistance to political party and party system development. Case study report: Nigeria. Overseas development institute (ODI)
Finkel, S E, Pérez-Liñán,A and Seligson, M S (2007) The effects of U.S. Foreign assistance on democracy building, 1990-2003. World politics. 59 (3) 404-438 Cambridge University Press
Fuller S. (2002) A question of motivations: Determining why donor countries give Aid, Res Publica - Journal of Undergraduate Research: 7 http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/respublica/vol7/iss1/7
Gulhati, R & Nallari, R (1988) Reform of foreign aid policies: The issue of inter-country allocation in Africa. World Development, 16, (10) 1167-1184
Gunther, Richard, Nikiforos, P. Diamandouros & Puhle, Hans-Jürgen (1995). The politics of democratic consolidation. Southern Europe in a comparative perspective. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Huntington, S. (1991). “The third wave: Democratisation in the late twenties century”. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
O’Keefe, M., Sidel, J., Marquette, H., Roche, C., Hudson, D. & Dasandi, N. (2014). Using action research and learning for politically informed programming. Research Paper 29. DLP
Ojwang, J.B (1990) constitutionalism in commonwealth today” in Malaysia Law Review. 4. (4).
Rakner, L., Rocha Menocal, A. & Fritz, V. (2007) Democratisation's third wave and the challenges of democratic deepening: Assessing international democracy assistance and lessons learned', research paper for the advisory board to Irish aid, overseas development institute (ODI),.
Santiso C (2001). International co-operation for democracy and good governance: Moving towards a second generation? Eur. J. Dev. Res. 13 (1)154-180.
Sule, B. , Wurobokki, H. S & Sambo, U. (2018) International Donor Agencies and Electoral Support in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic (1999-2015): The Missing Link. International journal of social science research 6 (1), 76-92.
Thomas, C (1997) In the name of democracy: US Policy towards Latin America in the Reagan’s years Berkeley. University of California press.
USAID & UKAID (2015). Still above the Ceiling (A Report on campaign finance and use of state administrative resources in The 2015 Presidential Election). Centre for Social Justice.
