Procedural Forms of Application of Administrative Forcing Measures by Employees of Internal Affairs Authorities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v4i5.2245Keywords:
administrative law, administrative process, administrative coercion, administrative processsystem of measures of administrative coercion, internal affairs bodiesAbstract
The procedure for applying measures of administrative coercion in the administrative activities of the internal affairs bodies has always been considered a topical issue. First of all, this is based on changes in recent years in the administrative procedural legislation and legislation on internal affairs bodies and the need to further improve the theory and practice in this area in connection with these updates.
Currently, it is customary to divide administrative coercion into three groups, based on the approaches recognized in theoretical views in this area: administrative warning, administrative restriction and administrative punishment. The application of these measures, in turn, is based on substantive and procedural law. In this regard, administrative procedural measures of coercion are also distinguished as separate measures of administrative coercion. The procedure for applying measures of administrative procedural coercion requires the provision of appropriate proceedings, including separate compulsory procedural actions.
References
Law No. O'RQ-701 of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated July 14, 2021 "On Licensing, Permitting and Notification Procedures" // National Legislative Information Base, July 15, 2021, No. 03/21/701/0674; 04/21/2022, No. 03/22/765/0332, 05/25/2022, No. 03/22/771/0448;
Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated September 29, 2010 "On prevention of delinquency and delinquency among minors" No. ORQ-263 // Collection of legal documents of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2010, No. 39, Article 341;
Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated April 2, 2019 "On administrative control over certain categories of persons released from penal institutions" No. O'RQ-532 //National database of legal documents, 12.05.2021, 03/21/690/ No. 0452;
Administrative law. Textbook. - T. 2016. B.180.
Kaplunov A. I., Lebedeva O. O. Protsessualnye formy primeneniya mer administrativnogo prinujdeniya sotrudnikami pravookhranitelnyx organov // Ugolovno-ispolnitelnoe pravo. 2016. No. 3 (25). S. 14.; Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod ed. A. I. Kaplunova. M., 2011. 536 p.; Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod ed. M. S. Studenikinoy, L. L. Popova. M., 2016. 704 p.; Administrativno-procesusualnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod ed. A. I. Kaplunova. SPb., 2015. 376 p.
S. Murataev and others. Administrative law and procedure. - T.: TDYU publishing house, 2022. – B.392.; Lebedeva O. O. Primenenie otdelnyx prinuditelnyx mer administrativnogo preduprejdeniya kak samostoyatelnoe administrativnoe proizvodstvo v strukture administrativnogo protsessa // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zurnal. 2015. No. 3. S. 203-210.;
Lebedeva O. O. O protsessualnom order of primenenia prinuditelnyx mer administrativnogo preduprejdeniya // Aktualnye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessualnogo prava: sb. St. po materialam ejegodnoy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. conf. (Sorokinskie chteniya), 25 times 2016 g.: v 3 t. / pod ed. Yu. E. Avrutina, A. I. Kaplunova. SPb., 2016. T. 1. S. 206-210.
