The Impact of Strategic Improvisation on Organizational Ambidexterity-Field Research

Authors

  • Sabrein Jamal Jalal Al-Zalzali Ministry of Planning / The National Center for Management Development and Information Technology, Iraq
  • Pof. Dr. Nadhom Jawad Kadhom University of Baghdad, College of Administration and Economics Department of Business Administration, Iraq

Keywords:

Strategic Improvisation, Organizational ambidexterity, Commercial Banks

Abstract

The research aimed to explore the extent to which strategic improvisation affects organizational ambidexterity. The research problem is embodied in the failure of organizations to effectively embody these variables in their work and the negative repercussions this has on their performance. The research derives its importance from the importance of the topics it addresses (strategic improvisation, organizational ambidexterity). The research community comprised managers working in commercial banks. The research sample consisted of (200) managers and officials in the aforementioned banks. A questionnaire was the primary tool for collecting data and information. AMOS software, version 22, was used to analyze the data and extract results. The research reached a number of conclusions and recommendations. The most prominent conclusions were the existence of a correlation between the research variables, as well as the impact of strategic improvisation on organizational ambidexterity. The most prominent recommendations were the need for business organizations in general, and private commercial banks in particular, to pay great attention to strategic improvisation, given its effective role in overcoming fluctuations and environmental conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Akadiri O. P. (2011), Development of Multi-Criteria Approach for the Selection of: Wolver Hampton, U. K.

2. Al-Bashqali, Mahmoud Muhammad Amin Othman and Sultan, Hikmat Rashid, (2021), "The Role of Strategic Improvisation in Achieving Strategic Sovereignty: A Survey Study of the Opinions of Administrative Leaders in a Sample of Private Universities in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Arab Journal of Management, Arab Organization for Administrative Development, Volume (41), Issue (1), pp. 126-95.

3. Bonfim, Leandro Rodrigo Canto & Silva, Gabrielle Ribeiro Rodrigues & Henrique Muller & Abib, Gustavo, (2018), "Exploring Risk Perception and Degree of Internationalization of Brazilian Small-and-Medium Enterprises", BAR, Rio de Janeior, Vol. (15), No. (1).

4. Ghosh, D., & Ray, M.R. (1997), "Risk, ambiguity, and decision choice: Some additional evidence", Decision Sciences, Vol. (28), No. (1).

5. Hamid, Atheer Mahdi, (2021), "The Impact of Strategic Leadership on Organizational ambidexterity: An Analytical Study of the Opinions of a Sample of Leaders in the Federal Police," Master's Thesis, University of Karbala, Iraq.Arshad, D., Razalli, M. R., Abo Bakar, L. J., Ahmad, H., & Mahmood, R. (2015), "Exploring the Incidence of Strategic Improvisation: Evidence from Malaysian Government Link Corporations," Asian Science, 11(24), 105-112.

6. He, Zi-Lin and Poh-Kam Wong, (2004), "Exploration Vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of The Ambidexterity Hypothesis", Journal Informs, Vol. (15), No (4).

7. Jansen J.J.P., George G., Bosch F.A.J.V. & Volberda H.W., (2009), "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Moderating role of Transformational Leadership", Journal of Management Studies, pp. (982-1007).

8. Justin, Jansen and John Peter. (2005), "Ambidextrous Organizations: A Multiple-Level Study of Absorptive Capacity, Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation and Performance", Erasmus Universities Rotterdam.

9. Kassotaki, O. (2022), "Review of Organization Ambidexterity Research", SAGE Open, pp.1-22.

10. Kau, J., & Zhu Wang Z.A. (2019). A system model for corporate entrepreneurship. International Journal of Manpower, Vol(26), No(6).

11. Kaylene C., Williams. (2012), "Business Intuition: The Mortar among the Bricks of Analysis". Journal of management Policy and Practice, Vol.13, No.5, pp.48-65.

12. pai, Ashwin. (2007) "Overcoming the Innovators Dilemma through Organizational ambidexterity within the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry" University of Nottingham.

13. Perry, L. T, (1991), "Strategic improvising: How to formulate and implement competitive strategies in concert", Organizational Dynamics, Vol. (19), No. (4), pp. (51-64).

14. Sattar, H.S.A., & Dhaher, M.H., (2022). "The Impact Organizational Improvisation On The Quality Of Decision –Making For Senior Leaders In The Ministry Of Planning". Journal of Positive School Psychology, Vol(6), No(8).

15. Sekaran Uma, (1984), Research Methods for Managers: A Skill-Building Approach, Wiley & Sons.

16. Triantafyllidis, Charalampos P. & Papageorgiou, Lazaros G., (2018), "An integrated platform for intuitive mathematical programming modeling using LaTeX", Published 10 September 2018, Copyright 2018 Triantafyllidis and Papageorgiou, Distributed under, Creative Commons CC-BY 4.

17. Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, Vol(16), No(3), 203-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0126.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28

How to Cite

Al-Zalzali , S. J. J., & Kadhom , N. J. (2025). The Impact of Strategic Improvisation on Organizational Ambidexterity-Field Research . American Journal of Economics and Business Management, 8(6), 2959–2972. Retrieved from https://globalresearchnetwork.us/index.php/ajebm/article/view/3737

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.