Analysis of the Influence of Contract Work Systems, Work Motivation and Compensation on Employee Performance

Authors

  • Marice Ancelino Pitoy Student of Master Management Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sam Ratulangi University Manado, Indonesia
  • Olivia Nelwan Department of Management Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sam Ratulangi University Manado, Indonesia
  • Victor Lengkong Department of Management Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sam Ratulangi University Manado, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v2i5.486

Keywords:

contract work systems, motivation, compensation, employee performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the Contract Work System, Work Motivation, and Compensation on Employee Performance, simultaneously or partially. The population in this study were all contract workers at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado, totaling 152 people, with the amount of data analyzed as many as 75 respondents. The sampling technique used is census. Methods of data collection using questionnaires and documentation. While the data analysis technique to test the hypothesis is multiple linear regression analysis. Based on data analysis, the results of the study indicate that there is a simultaneous effect of Contract Work System, Work Motivation, Compensation, on the Employee Performance variable with an F number of 28,772 and a significance level (probability number) of 0.000. Partially the Contract Work System has a tcount of 2,048 with a significance of 0.044. Because the probability value (sig) t < 5% (0.044 < 0.05) then the Employment Contract Work System has a positive and significant effect on the Employee Performance variable. Work Motivation has a tcount of 2,317 with a significance of 0.023. Because the probability value (sig) t < 5% (0.023 < 0.05) then Work Motivation has a significant positive effect on the Employee Performance variable. Compensation has a t count of 4.888 with a significance of 0.000. Because the probability value (sig) t < 5% (0.000 < 0.05) then compensation has a significant positive effect on employee performance.

References

Amrulloh, P. 2017. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Kepala Desa, Fasilitas Kantor, Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Se- Kecamatan Sukorejo. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 6, (3): PP.912-922.

Arianto, Nurmin dan Hadi Kurniawan. 2020. Pengaruh Motivasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. JENIUS: Jurnal Ilmiah, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Vo.3No.3 Mei.

Dunggio, Maryam dan SaepulBasri. 2019. Pengaruh sistem kerja kontrak dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada perusahaan erha clinic. KIN E R J A 16 (2):166-174.

Gunawan, Ahmad; Imam Sucipto dan Suryadi. 2020. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja dan Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Pada Kantor Desa Pasirsari Kecamatan Cikarang Selatan Kabupaten Bekasi.Jurnal IKRA-ITH Ekonomika Vol 3 No 1 Bulan Maret.

Junianto, Dwi dan Joko Sabtohadi. 2020. Pengaruh Sistem Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Industri Pabrik Gula. Equilibrium Volume 9. No. 1. Hal 1 – 9.

Januar, Agung, S., dan Firdaus, M. A. 2018. Kepuasan Kerja dan Status Pekerja Terhadap Kinerja. Manager: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 1(1), 151–166.

Mangkunegara. A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2017. Manajemen Sumber DayaManusia Perusahaan, Bandung:RemajaRosdakarya.

Moeheriono, 2014, Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: PT Raja GrafindoPersada.

Nugraha, B. A., Hakam, M. S., dan Susilo, H. 2017. Pengaruh Status Pekerja dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada Karyawan Auto 2000 Sukun Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 44, 96–103.

Oktavianti, Nopi. 2020.Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Kerja Karyawan PT. DEW Indonesia.JENIUS: Jurnal Ilmiah, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Vol.3. No.2 Januari.

Simamora, Henry. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIEY.

Sugiyono. (2014). Business Research Methods (Quantitative Approaches, Qualitative, and R & D). Alfabeta: Bandung.

Sugiyono.2010. Educational Research Methods with Quantitative Approaches, Qualitative, and R & D.Bandung: Alphabeta

Spencer, Lyle & Signe M. Spencer. 1993. Competence at Work, Models For Superior Performance. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Li, X., Wang, B., Hu, Q., Yapanto, L. M., &Zekiy, A. O. (2021). Application of artificial neural networks and fuzzy logics to estimate porosity for Asmari formation. Energy Reports, 7, 3090–3098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.05.034

Kankaew, K., Yapanto, LM, Waramontri, R., Arief, S., Hamsir, Sastrawati, N., & Espinoza-Maguiña, MR (2021). Supply chain management and logistics presentation: Mediation effect of competitive advantage. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 255–264.https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.3.007

Yapanto, LM, Tanipu, F., Paramata, AR, & Actors, E. (2020). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FISHERY COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONS. 17(25), 1329–1338.

Lasut, RF, Mandey, SL, Jan, AH. (2021). Analysis of the Effect of Service Quality and Premium Amount on Collectability Levels and Participant Satisfaction as Intervening Variables at BPJS Kesehatan Manado Branch. 633–646.

Musa, FNH, Tumbel, A., &Wullur, M. (2021). Discipline Analysis Of Work, Motivation And Loyalty Towards Employee Performance (Case Study At Gorontalo State University). 449–462.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-22

How to Cite

Pitoy, M. A., Nelwan, O., & Lengkong, V. (2021). Analysis of the Influence of Contract Work Systems, Work Motivation and Compensation on Employee Performance. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 2(5), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v2i5.486

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.